ZorroUI
Cage logo

Cage

Prototyping & Wireframing

Cage is an online proofing, review, and project collaboration software designed for designers and creative teams.

|Ease · Value · Features

Paid

Visit Tool

## What Cage Does Well Cage carves out a focused niche as an online proofing and creative review platform. Its core strength is structured feedback: clients and stakeholders can leave timestamped comments directly on images, videos, and documents, eliminating the chaos of feedback scattered across email threads. The version history system is genuinely useful, letting teams track exactly what changed between iterations and whether client notes were addressed. For agencies managing multiple client projects simultaneously, the project-based workspace organization keeps deliverables clearly separated. ## Who Cage Is Best For Cage is best suited for small-to-mid-sized creative agencies and in-house design teams that do heavy client-facing work — particularly those producing video content, brand assets, or marketing collateral that requires formal sign-off. The approval workflow, where clients can mark assets as approved or request changes, maps directly onto typical agency delivery processes. Teams already using tools like Adobe Creative Cloud or Slack will find the integrations reduce context-switching during review cycles. ## Main Limitations The absence of a free tier is a real barrier for freelancers or small teams wanting to evaluate the tool before committing. Cage is not a prototyping or wireframing tool in any meaningful sense — despite being categorized alongside them, it has no native design creation capabilities, so teams still need Figma, Sketch, or similar tools upstream. The UI feels dated compared to competitors, and the mobile experience for reviewers is noticeably weaker than the desktop version. Reporting and analytics features are also thin for teams that need to track review cycle efficiency. ## How It Compares to Alternatives Against Frame.io, Cage is more generalist but less polished specifically for video review. InVision's commenting features overlap significantly with Cage's core value prop, and InVision offers actual prototyping on top of it. Ziflow and Filestage are direct competitors in the proofing space and offer more robust approval audit trails, which matters for regulated industries. Cage sits at a mid-market price point without clearly outperforming either budget or premium alternatives on any single dimension.

Pros

  • Timestamped, pinned comments on images and video make client feedback precise and actionable
  • Approval/rejection workflow with version history creates a clear audit trail for client sign-offs
  • Project-based organization works well for agencies managing multiple simultaneous client accounts
  • Integrations with Slack, Adobe Creative Cloud, and Dropbox reduce manual file handoffs

Cons

  • No free tier makes it difficult to evaluate before purchasing, unlike most direct competitors
  • Zero native design or prototyping capabilities despite being listed in that category
  • UI and mobile reviewer experience feel noticeably behind modern competitors like Frame.io or Filestage

ZorroUI Verdict: Cage is a solid fit for creative agencies that need a dedicated client proofing and approval tool and are already using separate software for actual design work. Teams wanting an all-in-one design-plus-review platform, or freelancers unwilling to pay without a trial period, should look elsewhere.

How does Cage stack up?

Pick another tool to compare side by side